Pluralistic Approach to Moral Theory †Free Samples to Students

Question: Discuss about the Pluralistic Approach to Moral Theory. Answer: Introduction: Kants philosophy is basedon the aspect that the actions performed by the individuals are morally good. The main focus of Kantian Philosophy is that the individuals need to comply with the legal obligations for creating a good image within the workplace. In view of this perspective, discriminations should not be allowed in the workplace. This is because it results in the destruction of the workplace decorum (Harris, 2017). If the discriminations come from the employees, then they are violating the rules and regulations management. Moreover, this violation can be considered as deliberate, reflecting the deviation from the moral values. Attaching the case, engaging the employees into the workplace issues generates workplace diversity. Therefore, it is the duty of the managers to conduct group discussions for averting the instances of conflicts, discriminations and harassments in the workplace premises (Johnson, 2015). According to the Utilitarian view, the directions of the people should be based on exposing kind attitude to the people. This relates with the enhancement of social status through catering to the needs, demands and requirements of the clients. Based on this aspect, discriminations should not allowed in the workplace. This is because it does not ensure the wellbeing of the employees. The statements of Rachel expose the disinterest of the employees towards the recruitment and selection process. The adoption of new processes in the workplace issues and systems is good in terms of attracting the candidates (Vaughn, 2015). On the other hand, if this innovation brings biasness among the employees, it proves harmful for the productivity management. In this section, the centre of discussion would be the stakeholder theory under the utilitarian approach. The ethical decisions in the organizations are sometimes made under the influence of utilitarianism. The experts have debated that the companies or the service providers must have a proper relationship of trust among them. Only then the companies can take the competitive advantage properly (Waller, 2013)The case of the utilitarianism in the fighter workers has been really effective in this matter. If the companies can keep a better relationship with the stakeholders, this will help them to earn a better spot in the industry and have better financial outcomes. Trust is a very important, valuable and rare source that is very hard to achieve. As per the utilitarian sources, this will bring the best competitive advantage for the organizations (Hinman, 2012). The case of the fighter workers will have to be discussed in this section. The terrible consequences might take place because of the closing of the doors by the nations for all the outsiders (Waller, 2013).The immigration facilities have been misused and the most important stakeholder in this section is the government. Some of the major impacts or influences that can be caused in this context are the economic inefficiencies;the economic inequality is also one very gruesome factor in this issue (Reamer, 2013).The utilitarian approach in this matter is not at all acceptable since laws and rules of the country are violated. As the principle stakeholders, the government will have to adjust the immigration policies properly but not following the utilitarian approach. The political tyranny can increase because of taking the utilitarian approach indeed (Hinman, 2012). The case of the fighter workers might fall on the different people like the immigrants of one country, the native workers, and the national culture of the countries, labor markets of the concerned countries, capital flight, and entrepreneurship of the new businesses. There are other kinds of views as well. If the utilitarian approach is followed for the fighter workers, the security of the people will be in great distress (Reamer, 2013).It has been believed that the illegal immigration in the countries disturbs the natural peace of the country. Thus the people of the various countries are affected by illegal immigration and activity of fight workers who help to mitigate the problems. If the fight workers do not respond to the serious problems, the entire nation will be in a pool of trouble. Utilitarian view of the discriminations at the workplace One of the most important things to be addressed here is the discriminations in the workplace for the employees. The companies have to take some decisions for the employees that would make them happy (Hinman, 2012). The company has to identify the reasons for the general happiness of the employees. The pains and pleasures will have to be discussed in the various ways for the employees in the workplaces. If the employees are deprived of the self-development opportunities in the workplace, they will feel the pain management. The stresses that are caused during the sorrowful events at the workplace can be called as the reasons for the sorrow. If the employees get the proper job satisfaction this can cause them the pleasure and lead them to the general happiness (Hinman, 2012). It is very interesting to highlight on the facts of utility on the various aspects of utility. It means the human beings should have the ideas about the persons, actions and the institutions to get the happiness in the world order. The human motivation can be given from the aspects of the various sorts of the happiness among the human beings. Bentham and Mill both have the idea that the only aim of the human beings is to reach their happiness. Bentham has been very much hedonist in his approach to the human happiness (Trevino Nelson, 2016). The two sovereign components of the human nature are the pain and pleasure. Bentham has always insisted that happiness for the human beings is completely based on the pleasure of the human beings. The psychological hedonism can be attributed to the concepts of Bentham. Mill has treated this issue of hedonism to be axiomatic (Trevino Nelson, 2016). The psychological egoism and hedonism are the two most important elements of the entire scenario ab out the human happiness and motivation. The utilitarian view determines the fact about the utility of the agent and the happiness of the human beings. References Crane, A. Matten, D., 2016.Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press. Davey, M. (2018). We dont want positive discrimination,' say female firefighters.the Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/jan/29/we-dont-want-positive-discrimination-say-female-firefighter Harris, H., 2017. Human Dignity and Business Ethics. InEncyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics(pp. 1-6). Springer International Publishing. Hinman, L. (2012).Ethics: A pluralistic approach to moral theory. Nelson Education. Johnson, M., 2015.Morality for humans: Ethical understanding from the perspective of cognitive science. University of Chicago Press. Kant, I., 2017.Kant: The metaphysics of morals. Cambridge University Press. Reamer, F. G. (2013).Social work values and ethics. Columbia University Press. Trevino, L.K. Nelson, K.A., 2016.Managing business ethics: Straight talk about how to do it right. John Wiley Sons. Vaughn, L., 2015.Doing ethics: Moral reasoning and contemporary issues. WW Norton Company. Waller, B. N. (2013).Consider Ethics: Pearson New International Edition: Theory, Readings, and Contemporary Issues. Pearson Higher Ed.